by, discourses on non-white outsiders including asylum seekers and undocumented immigrants. But since that template is not required (and no one is suggesting it be I would assume its use will be non-existant (I don't run into it today, certainly). Jc3s5h ( talk ) 02:29, (UTC) When did I make such a statement? The International Journal of Critical Pedagogy. The question is, when you find a date written in the yyyy-MM-DD format, was the author governing himself/herself by ISO 8601. Oppenheimer (September 18, 2003). Since we're debating the format anyway, let me add: Yes, yyyy-MM-DD is unambiguous. JIMp talk cont 21:03, (UTC) Fortunately, it is not my responsibility to cure your lack of critical reading skills and/or your willful ignorance. Brandt, Jenn; Kizer, Sam (2015). If the only issue is that some people aren't used to it yet, we'd better change the Willis Tower back to Sears, too. The solution is to avoid using 2008-09 so we don't have to worry about. It's not necessary for us to know exactly how big the margin of "legitimate" opinions were.
White privilege - Wikipedia
And (as discussed elsewhere on this page) it is clear that people, computers, and software can and do in the real world find themselves uncertain as to whether the format is yyyy- DD-MM (or actually believe that to be the format). I used to write dates in yyyy-MM-DD mainly because of the date linking feature that existed before. The multiple formations of Australian whiteness Archived April 10, 2013, at the Wayback Machine. Redrose64 ( talk ) 15:42, (UTC) It is the magic word #dateformat. "Intersectionality: the double bind of race and gender". Black Wealth, White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. Race and the Invisible Hand. Massey, Douglas; Denton, Nancy (January 15, 1998). "The whiteness of climate change" (PDF). Also, keep with yyyy-MM-DD as it is consistent with ISO 8601; note that I would support WP adopting ISO 8601.